DARKEST SIDE OF THE MOON JUMMP PLUS

Nonetheless it was a greatĪchievement to get away with it, politically speaking. Just look what happened toĭear teammate Gus Grissom and comp. They were shitting bricks not to say the wrong They did not sound or look like men who had achieved the And when these poor three astronauts returned and sat down at theĬonference. Together in the same small valley with almost identical close range Why is that? Not a big enough studio? All the 360 shots are stitched There is not one wide shot made from the lunar surface of the horizon. For some reason none of the 6 landings ever did this?. Go to climb the highest peak to see the view, to get the big What allĭoes humans do when they walk in the desert or in the mountains?Įspecially if it is the first time they are there? I wanted to ask all of you a simple question. Way to further cover up the greatest political secret in human No doubt a fantastic mockumentary by William Karel. There is no point in explaining anything to someone who refuses to listen. We all know conspiracy cheerleaders will be claiming everything is fake regardless of what they are shown. It was a badly spun news story, as someone got their wires crossed. A piece of petrified wood was given to the retired Dutch Prime Minister.

DARKEST SIDE OF THE MOON JUMMP PLUS

Authentic rocks from NASA were encased in plastic and much smaller, plus this wood was never authenticated by NASA as genuine. Before anyone tries, the whole moon rock was ' petrified wood' story, was used by skeptics, however they didn't bother to read the whole story. Although I'm sure skeptics will try and claim the rocks were fake as well, and everyone was paid to lie. Remember, Countries we're watching the US, and the samples from the moon were analyzed and proved to be from the moon, and not the earth. Lol )This doesn't automatically mean the missions never happened. (I believe they are trying for more manned missions very soon, but I'm sure they are 'fake' too. It's dangerous and expensive, with no real gain at the time. Mainly it's lack of interest and funding. I haven't been to High school in years, does that mean I never went? Lol. People seem to think that because there haven't been any manned missions to the moon in a while, then it must be fake. All they do is laugh, make jokes, and say how all believers are sheep. A simple Google search shows all the proof, and mistakes on the hoax sites. It's very silly, but there are millions who believe it never took place. In today's world people laugh at skeptics claiming we never went to the moon. Some have said they wouldn't believe it if they were flown to the moon and showed the landing sites. It can't be done in their minds, and no evidence, not moon rock samples, not videos, or pictures will convince them. Most never visited the air and space museum, or read anything on NASA. Usually someone denies something they aren't experienced in. Of course a hoax believer would say all evidence is fake. Other countries knew where the astronauts were.

Most skeptics and other self appointed experts don't take a lot of things into consideration. Its intent is to inform and entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that one should always view television with a critical eye. With use of 'hijacked' archival footage, false documents, real interviews taken out of context or transformed through voice-over or dubbing, staged interviews, as well as, interviews with astronauts like Buzz Aldrin and others, Dark Side Of The Moon navigates the viewer through lies and truth fact and fiction. A subtle blend of facts, fiction and hypothesis around the first landing on the moon, Dark Side Of The Moon illustrates how the truth can be twisted by the manipulation of images. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, whose 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968) had provided much inspiration, to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn't be missed. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn't afford any expensive public relations failures. In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S.

She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. How could the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon? During an interview with Stanley Kubrick's widow an extraordinary story came to light.

Darkest side of the moon jummp